GOT MORALITY?
This is an interesting topic for this forum, to see where you all stand on the issue of morality.
In my case, im more of an amoral man myself, meaning that when it comes to issues of right and wrong on the moral scale, im neither on the left nor the right, but rather i stand in the middle.
an example of amorality is taking a particular issue like say i dont know...murder and seeing it as neither right or wrong in itself, but it's open to interpretation by the indvidual actor and not any third party.
especially since the ethical behaviour society promotes isnt adhered to by that same society, for instance person a murders a whole town of people and on a personal level sees nothing wrong with it, because socities murder everyday on a grander scale,so who are they to judge him. person b wants to murder the whole town,but refrains because he sees that everyday on a grand scale society murders and he doesn't want to mirror that, because for him it's wrong in one way or another.
In amorality both persons are entitled to their particular actions with no third party acting as a judge, dictating mandates and talking about duties and obligations. the only duty and obligation they both have is to themselves. Outside of that main reason of society murdering everyday on a grander scale than any one individual can ever do there are various personal and unique reasons for refraining or acting within a particular scenerio. this brings up another purpose of this topic, which is to get your input on what i've just said concerning amorality. ENJOY.
In my case, im more of an amoral man myself, meaning that when it comes to issues of right and wrong on the moral scale, im neither on the left nor the right, but rather i stand in the middle.
an example of amorality is taking a particular issue like say i dont know...murder and seeing it as neither right or wrong in itself, but it's open to interpretation by the indvidual actor and not any third party.
especially since the ethical behaviour society promotes isnt adhered to by that same society, for instance person a murders a whole town of people and on a personal level sees nothing wrong with it, because socities murder everyday on a grander scale,so who are they to judge him. person b wants to murder the whole town,but refrains because he sees that everyday on a grand scale society murders and he doesn't want to mirror that, because for him it's wrong in one way or another.
In amorality both persons are entitled to their particular actions with no third party acting as a judge, dictating mandates and talking about duties and obligations. the only duty and obligation they both have is to themselves. Outside of that main reason of society murdering everyday on a grander scale than any one individual can ever do there are various personal and unique reasons for refraining or acting within a particular scenerio. this brings up another purpose of this topic, which is to get your input on what i've just said concerning amorality. ENJOY.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Trörkrvisätänsrökrëh on -
Morality is vague. What you may percieve as "right" someone else may think is "wrong", vice versa. An individual perception of right and wrong will justify the definition of morality, and who is to argue a common morality? I certainly cannot relate to the morality of most formal/informal norms of society, does this make me amoral or an individual? What do I care what you percieve as "wrong" or "right"? For I am honored to have my own sense of morality.
About
Support MySatan.net
If you wish to help support MySatan.net to maintain the quality services you enjoy here, please donate. Every little bit helps me maintain the premium services that we utilize.
Badge
© 2009 Created by Eric T. Schuetz on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
